The exclusion of JK Rowling from the Harry Potter reunion: justified or not?


The 17the In November, it was announced that the original cast of the Harry Potter series would reunite to celebrate the 20e birthday of Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone, the first installment of the franchise. Title Harry potter 20e Birthday: Back to Hogwarts, the meeting is scheduled for 1st January 2022.

The series’ legendary cast, including Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint and Tom Felton, would all be on this journey of nostalgia. As the cast returns to celebrate the franchise’s monumental journey, JK Rowling, the writer and creator of the Wizarding World of Harry Potter remain excluded of the event. Although it is speculated that she will appear on the show through previously archived footage, Rowling has apparently been barred from participating.

Why is Rowling excluded?

This exclusion may not surprise anyone because of Rowling’s issue. anti-trans test published on 10e June 2020. The essay is a “defenseAgainst the backlash she received for supporting Maya Forstater on Twitter earlier that year. Maya Forstater is a tax specialist who, when she was fired from her job due to transphobic tweets, wanted an employment tribunal judge to protect the lack of belief in gender identity, which is a belief that individual gender identity takes precedence over sex. She insisted that her belief in the absence of gender identity be legally recognized.

In his position of influence, comments and support for causes that violate human rights are unacceptable. Her role as a creator cannot be ruled out, but the Harry potter the universe is more than Rowling. The reunion will celebrate the larger than life aura of the universe that could have been created by it, but at the end of the day is supported by readers and the public

This lack of belief in gender identity conflicts with the rights of transgender and non-binary people. In the essay, Rowling’s critique rejects the existence of gender identity and focuses only on biological sex. By simply excluding trans and non-binary people from the conversation, Rowling says only those who were born female deserve women’s rights, which includes cis women and trans men, but not trans women.

This is problematic because trans men don’t need women’s rights, they need trans rights while trans women desperately need women’s rights. Thus, excluding them simply on the basis of their assigned gender is highly transphobic. Moreover, she not only reinforces the fact that biological sex is real many times, but also ignores gender identity and transgender women while publicly supporting extremely transphobic people.

the Harry potter The literary and film world has been a haven for many LGBTQIA + people, and Rowling herself added to the inclusiveness after the publication of the seven books when in October 2007 she said that “Dumbledore is homosexual. This added to the agitation against her in 2020 as on the one hand her books gave the LGBTQIA + community a sense of belonging and on the other hand, she openly discriminated against their identity. But after her anti-trans comments, her previous attempts at inclusion present themselves as queer bait where it appears she is using LGBTQIA + characters only as a marketing technique.

Become a member of the FII

After the essay was published and heavily criticized, fans also began to notice other problematic tropes that Rowling vehemently used in the books. The characters of Cho Chang, Parvati, and Padma Patil are criticized for being stereotypical depictions of Asian and South Asian characters who remain underdeveloped at best throughout the series.

The suspicions of racism and blatant body shame she used throughout the series on minor characters have also been criticized. Pansy Parkinson’s physical characteristics are sometimes referred to as “like a pug”And Dudley is continually compared to a pig, with the intention of generating humor.

Read also : No, JK Rowling, cis women shouldn’t play Gatekeepers to trans women

Given Rowling’s public comments and fanaticism, her exclusion from the meeting seems justifiable. But many fans have expressed their disappointment. Although Rowling has not commented on it, the internet seems divided on the matter. Some argue that banning the Creator’s presence at a meeting is unnatural, as the credit for the existence of the Harry Potter universe can be given entirely to JK Rowling. The refusal to include the author in the upcoming show is unacceptable to many.

Even though this is his creation, it is not and cannot necessarily be associated with his bigotry and transphobia as over the years the characters and elements of the magical universe have overtaken their creator. and have become independent entities with their own associations. JK Rowling is only the author of the books but Harry potter has become more than just a written word. It is therefore entirely justified that the Warner brothers decided to exclude Rowling from the company. The outrage around this is certainly not justified as his inclusion in such a big event will definitely validate his anti-trans and TES views.

Why the exclusion is justified

The association of the artist with art makes this whole dilemma more complex. The exclusion of JK Rowling is necessary due to the damage she has and can do through her comments. Over the past year, his comments have validated many Trans exclusionist separatist (TES) that ignore transgender and non-binary identities.

In his position of influence, comments and support for causes that violate human rights are unacceptable. Her role as a creator cannot be ruled out, but the Harry potter the universe is more than Rowling. The reunion will celebrate the larger than life aura of the universe that could have been created by it, but at the end of the day is supported by readers and the public.

Rowling’s anti-trans stance and her tweets rejecting the term “people who have their periodMakes its association with a beloved cinematic universe all the more problematic. Daniel radcliffe spoke against the author and declared: “To all those who now feel that their experience with books has been tarnished or diminished, I am deeply sorry for the pain these comments have caused you … If these books have taught you that love is the most powerful force in life. universe… if you believe that a particular character is trans, non-binary or gender fluent, or is gay or bisexual; if you’ve found something in these stories that resonated with you and helped you at any point in your life – then it’s between you and the book you’ve read, and that’s sacred. ”

Even though this is his creation, it is not and cannot necessarily be associated with his bigotry and transphobia as over the years the characters and elements of the magical universe have overtaken their creator. and have become independent entities with their own associations.

JK Rowling is only the author of the books but Harry potter has become more than just a written word. It is therefore entirely justified that the Warner brothers decided to exclude Rowling from the company. The outrage around this is certainly not justified as its inclusion in such a big event will definitely validate his anti-trans and TES views.

His contribution to the franchise is undeniable, but that doesn’t mean his damaging views need to be validated. If for some people this exclusion seems too radical and unacceptable, it is nevertheless justified because the author’s comments were also exclusionary and unacceptable.

Read also : An open letter to JK Rowling on the casting of Johnny Depp as Grindelwald


The selected image: Metro

Feminist media need feminist allies!

Get premium content, exclusive benefits and help us stay independent, free and accessible.

BECOME A MEMBER OF THE FII

Choose your package!



Source link

Previous Last minute gift ideas from local independent booksellers
Next Newcastle "want Moussa Dembele loan transfer", Chelsea "lead De Ligt pursuit after failing with Marquinhos offer"